Location. Is it where it is supposed to be?
We compare reported locations with evidence captured at the physical site.
Goloka helps you verify assets, facilities, programmes and physical conditions using local observations, structured checks and supporting evidence.

Depending on your programme and the asset involved, we can design verification around four practical questions.

We compare reported locations with evidence captured at the physical site.
Contributors provide photographs, video, location information and structured observations.
Where a safe functionality test can be defined, we capture evidence of whether it is operational.
Verification can include service observations or supporting evidence from intended users.






Send us your asset list, programme records, locations or the conditions you want independently checked.
We define the evidence required for each item, including GPS, timestamps, photographs, video, structured questions, functionality checks or community corroboration.
Appropriately located and qualified contributors receive clear instructions on what must be observed and recorded.
Submissions are checked against the agreed criteria. Unclear or inconsistent evidence can be flagged for review or rechecking.
Receive connected evidence linked to the relevant asset, facility, location, programme or reported condition.
Collect more than answers with GPS, photos, video, audio and other field evidence built into the study.
Identifies exactly what was verified.
Confirms where the evidence was captured.
Shows when the observation took place.
Provides visual evidence from the site.
Records findings against the agreed checks.
Shows whether the asset or service is working.
Indicates whether the evidence passed review.
Adds context from the verification process.
Shows what changed across repeat verification visits.
Provides supporting local corroboration where needed.
A single verification tells you what was observed on a particular day. Repeat verification can show whether an asset remained functional, whether a programme progressed or whether local conditions changed.
Where the engagement allows it, observations can be linked to the same asset or place over time rather than treated as unrelated field visits.
Explore Infrastructure intelligence
Yes. Share the asset list and locations, and we will assess network coverage, access, sample requirements and the most practical verification plan.
Yes, where a safe and appropriate functionality test can be clearly defined. We agree the evidence required before deployment.
Yes. Repeat verification can link observations to the same asset or place over time so changes can be tracked.
Yes. Existing identifiers and records can form the verification register, subject to a review of structure, completeness and location data.
Send us a sample of the assets, facilities or locations you want to verify. We will propose an evidence standard, methodology and pilot scope so you can see how the approach works before expanding it.
Talk to our team